A lot of studies said that teenage girls rebel because of their fathers' absence. But why do Olivia Perry and Taylor Coleman seemed not to support these studies? These two teenage girls grew up with their fathers by their side but still became rebellious.
I found an article in the internet entitled Who Am I Supposed To Side With On Preachers’ Daughters? I’m Going With Nobody written by Jill O'Rourke. This article talks about fathers who are preachers but have rebellious daughters. The author wrote the problems these two girls’ parents are experiencing on raising their children
The author quoted, "Taylor’s dad allows her to storm off and then goes into the other room to ask God not to let his daughter become a porn star. Even he admits that he made mistakes raising his older children.”
This only tells that a person cannot easily change someone’s perspective. The father is a preacher but the daughter’s change of attitude will only happen if his daughter will be willing to change. The father cannot force his daughter especially when their child chooses to be very stubborn.
The author also stated, “This is also the tactic Olivia’s dad uses to deal with difficult parenting problems. In the middle of a family conversation, during which Olivia’s older sister admits to smoking weed and starts crying, the dad throws his head back and asks God to bless his family’s conversation. He resigns himself to the fact that they’re going to get a paternity test done, then places his hand on Olivia’s head and prayed some more.”
Mr. Perry himself cannot persuade his daughter to obey him and change her attitude. He cannot influence her on things he wants her to be.
In conclusion, not all rebellious girls are fatherless. A lot of them have their fathers by their side. A lot of them have fathers who are trying their best to be a father. But their presence seem no difference when they are absent. The rebellion of a daughter is caused by her own decisions. This article proved that fathers are not a big influence to their daughters.